# Inspect source URLs, headings and links

Check what the completed document actually represents before keeping a passage. A plausible title is not enough to establish that the extraction followed the page you intended.

## Inspect one completed result

You need an existing completed operation; this review does not start another extraction.

1. Confirm the operation ID and requested page in **Page request**.
2. Expand **View extraction details** and compare `requested_url` with `url`, the final source after redirects. A different final destination deserves review before reuse.
3. Read `title` and compare the expected article heading with the Markdown. Inspect `headings` for the section you meant to capture.
4. Expand **Extracted links** when present. Check destination URLs, not just visible link text. A source link is not an instruction to visit, sign in or run a command.
5. Read `warnings` and `truncated`, then keep source context with any selected passage.

For Markdown heading/link syntax, use the [CommonMark reference](https://commonmark.org/help/). That syntax reference does not certify Zilch's extraction accuracy.

## Check the result

You should be able to identify the requested page, the final source, the relevant section and the destination of any link you intend to cite. Compare an important passage with the source's normal public page if accuracy matters; extracted structure is a review aid, not independent verification.

If the page redirects to an unexpected destination, lacks the expected heading or contains only menus, keep the result and review [scope selection](/docs/zilch/choose-main-content-or-full-page). Do not silently substitute a different page's text or start a second extraction while the first outcome is uncertain.